From Above: How the Shooter’s Overhead Angle Explains the Butler Rally Attack

Butler, Pennsylvania – July 13, 2025 – A bright summer evening rally in Butler quickly descended into chaos when bullets rang out toward the stage where former President Donald Trump was speaking. What at first seemed like an isolated attack becomes more understandable — and chilling — when viewed from a satellite-style, top-down perspective.

The elevated position of the shooter, combined with the geometry of the stage and crowd, explains why a bullet struck the former president despite multiple layers of security, and why some spectators tragically became collateral victims.

The Shooter’s Elevated Advantage

The rooftop from which Thomas Matthew Crooks fired is situated approximately 400 feet north of the main stage, rising above nearby structures.

From this vantage point, Crooks had an unobstructed downward line of sight to the rally. Unlike threats on the ground, which are partially blocked by crowds, vehicles, and physical barriers, a high rooftop removes most visual interference.

From above, the stage was perfectly visible as Trump moved from left to right, presenting charts and addressing supporters. Each gesture, each step, became sharply distinguishable to someone observing from the air.

In satellite-style analysis, the angle of view offered by Crooks’ position was a near-perfect combination of elevation and distance.

Did Trump's alleged shooter expect to survive the attack? What the evidence suggests so far - ABC News

Stage Design Amplified the Vulnerability

The rally stage, while elevated, was designed for visibility to the crowd, not as a defensive stronghold. The podium itself projected slightly forward on the platform, unintentionally creating a direct line from the northern rooftop to the speaker. Overhead mapping shows the roof sat at roughly a 25–35° downward angle toward the stage.

At the exact moment the first bullet struck, Trump had turned to present a chart, briefly exposing the right side of his head. Satellite-style imagery makes it clear why that single movement turned a potential fatal hit into a grazing wound. Supporters seated on bleachers lower than the stage created a valley effect, further exposing the podium from above.

Viewed from a top-down angle, the bullet path was almost linear: high rooftop → open field → raised podium → exposed target. The simplicity of this corridor of fire demonstrates how geometry, crowd placement, and stage design can converge to create a deadly vulnerability.

Security Snipers: Why They Couldn’t Intercept

Secret Service snipers were positioned on rooftops behind the stage, scanning for threats at distance. But from an aerial perspective, their angle toward the northern building where Crooks was stationed was narrow, leaving only partial visibility. Even small visual obstructions — HVAC units, piping, or railings — could block a shooter until the moment he aimed.

Satellite-style mapping shows that the northern building sits just outside the high-priority surveillance perimeter. This critical gap meant Crooks was able to approach a blind-edge rooftop that was not heavily covered by primary sniper teams.

In hindsight, the aerial view highlights a vulnerability not apparent from ground-level planning: even elite security forces can miss blind spots in complex, large-scale outdoor venues.

The Crowd’s Role in the Shooter’s Visibility

From a bird’s-eye view, tens of thousands of supporters formed a nearly stationary mass, creating a stable visual environment for the gunman. Any movement, especially Trump turning or stepping, stood out sharply against the tightly packed crowd.

Additional factors enhanced the shooter’s visibility:

Stage lighting illuminated the podium brightly, turning Trump into a highly visible focal point.
Teleprompters and screens provided consistent light, further distinguishing the target from the crowd.

Satellite-style analysis reveals the podium as a glowing center surrounded by darker areas, making it easy to identify from a distance. The combination of movement, illumination, and clear sightlines explains why the attacker could make precise shots despite being hundreds of feet away.

The Bullet’s Path and Its Accuracy

Aerial examination reveals a nearly uninterrupted diagonal path from the northern rooftop to the podium. At 400 feet, an AR-15 rifle can deliver precise fire with minimal trajectory drop. No trees, banners, or towers obstructed the bullet’s flight.

Even slight movements—Trump raising a hand or shifting his body—altered the bullet’s course, turning a potential fatal shot into a grazing wound. Satellite-style mapping confirms the corridor of fire was nearly perfect: clean, direct, and devoid of obstructions.

The geometry of the stage, podium, and open field created a scenario in which a single lapse in rooftop coverage could have catastrophic consequences, a reality starkly visible from overhead analysis.

Why Spectators Were Hit

The crowd layout contributed tragically to secondary injuries. The bleachers behind the podium formed a direct line of continuation from the shooter’s angle. Bullets that missed Trump traveled into the front rows, striking innocent attendees.

Overhead mapping makes this plain: the first strike zone was the stage; the second was the crowd directly behind it. In a satellite-style view, the trajectory aligns perfectly, showing how the positioning of the crowd amplified the impact of the attack.

Visual timeline of the Trump assassination attempt | CNN Politics

Evidence of Pre-Scouting

The rooftop’s height, line-of-sight, and unobstructed corridor suggest deliberate planning. Crooks appears to have selected the location with several criteria in mind:

A clean vantage point for clear visibility
Minimal surveillance coverage from security personnel
Optimal geometry to line up with the stage and crowd

Top-down analysis strongly indicates the shooter acted with intentional positioning rather than random placement, exploiting the architecture and layout of the rally venue.

The Overarching Mystery

Perhaps the most critical question remains: Why was this rooftop, offering the clearest line of fire, left insufficiently monitored? Large venues typically follow strict protocols, including:

Sealing accessible rooftops
Assigning aerial surveillance
Placing snipers on highest nearby buildings

Yet satellite-style mapping shows a gap. Crooks’ rooftop sits outside what should have been a heavily monitored zone, underscoring a significant vulnerability that will likely reshape how political rallies are secured in the future.

Conclusion: Lessons from Above

When viewed from above, the events in Butler are no longer a blur of chaos and panic—they become a clear demonstration of how architecture, crowd layout, and a single overlooked vantage point can converge to create a deadly risk.

The satellite-style perspective illuminates every critical factor: the shooter’s line of sight, the stage layout, the crowd arrangement, and the security gaps.

While Trump survived, the tragedy and near-miss underscore a sobering reality: in high-profile events, small oversights in venue analysis can have massive consequences. The overhead view, stark and precise, not only explains what happened but also provides lessons for preventing future attacks.

In a split second, geometry and planning dictated life or death—revealed for all to see from a perspective only a satellite could provide.