Laura Loomer Explodes on Candace Owens Over ‘Sick’ Claim Against Erika Kirk — Inside the Right-Wing Meltdown No One Saw Coming

The conservative world is on fire — and this time, it’s not because of Washington or the Democrats. It’s an all-out war within the right itself.

At the center of the storm: Candace Owens, her explosive conspiracy theories about Charlie Kirk’s death, and a furious backlash led by none other than Laura Loomer, one of Donald Trump’s loudest online defenders.

Over the past week, Owens has launched a barrage of claims linking Kirk’s fatal shooting at Utah Valley University on September 10 to everything from Israel to shadowy political donors.

But the latest twist — accusing Erika Kirk, Charlie’s grieving wife, of knowing in advance about her husband’s assassination — has crossed a moral line for many on the right.

And Laura Loomer is not holding back.

“Demented,” Loomer wrote bluntly on X. “Candace Owens is now turning her conspiracies onto the wife of Charlie Kirk. Erika Kirk, just know that many of us are disgusted by what Candace is doing to you and @TPUSA.

Imagine insinuating that Charlie’s wife had something to do with his assassination. SICK.”

Those words ripped through conservative circles like a lightning bolt — igniting a feud that’s tearing apart a movement built on loyalty, faith, and outrage.

From Allies to Enemies: The Friendship That Imploded

It wasn’t long ago that Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk were inseparable allies — the glamorous duo of conservative activism, touring campuses together under the Turning Point USA (TPUSA) banner, championing free speech and conservative values.

But insiders say cracks began forming long before Kirk’s death. “They were close, but Candace started drifting into darker, more conspiratorial territory,” one former TPUSA staffer told The Daily Mail. “Charlie was worried she was going too far down the rabbit holes.”

That concern, tragically, became prophetic.

After Kirk’s shocking death — the details of which remain under federal investigation — Owens quickly seized on the vacuum of answers.

She released what she called leaked texts between herself and Kirk, alleging that he’d been under pressure from “powerful Jewish donors.” From there, the story spiraled.

Within days, Owens was hinting that the FBI and Israeli operatives might be involved in a cover-up — and that Erika Kirk might have known what was coming.

To many, even on the far right, that was a step too far.

Turning Point in Turmoil

Within TPUSA, the organization Kirk built from a college dorm room into a multimillion-dollar powerhouse, Owens’ accusations have caused deep unease.

According to senior insiders who spoke anonymously to the Daily Mail, Owens’ remarks have “rocked the organization to its core.”

“People are angry, confused, and scared to speak out,” one staffer said. “We lost our founder — our friend. And now his death is being twisted into a circus. This is exactly what Charlie feared most — the movement eating itself alive.”

Despite the mounting pressure, TPUSA leadership has chosen not to confront Owens publicly, fearing that an official statement would only add fuel to the fire. “They want it to die down naturally,” said another source. “But it’s not going away. It’s exploding.”

Erika Kirk Breaks Her Silence

Caught in the crossfire is Erika Kirk, the 33-year-old widow now trying to raise her children while managing her late husband’s legacy.

In a recent interview on Fox News, Erika finally addressed the online storm without naming Owens directly. Her words were heartbreakingly measured.

“There’s no linear blueprint for grief,” she said quietly. “Everyone processes loss differently. But I just ask that people pray, think, and consider before posting things online — because those words don’t just hurt me. They’ll impact my children in the future.”

Her plea, both dignified and devastating, struck a chord across the internet — even among Owens’ former fans. Comments flooded in supporting Erika and condemning what many called “a public cruelty masquerading as truth-seeking.”

Candace Owens Doubles Down

But if critics expected Candace Owens to back down, they underestimated her.

In a series of lengthy monologues on her podcast, Owens insisted she was merely “asking questions” and accused the media of “protecting powerful interests.”

“I’m not implying anything,” she said. “I’m just saying that facts need to be looked at. There are too many coincidences, too many unanswered questions. People deserve transparency.”

Yet even those sympathetic to her anti-establishment message are growing uneasy. “She’s crossed into dangerous territory,” one conservative pundit told The Guardian. “When grief becomes content, that’s not journalism — that’s exploitation.”

Owens’ critics say her pattern is clear: ignite outrage, claim victimhood, and keep the clicks rolling. “It’s performative conspiracy,” another insider said. “She thrives on being banned, attacked, or blamed. Every scandal grows her audience.”

Laura Loomer’s Fury: ‘This Is Personal’

For Loomer, the line wasn’t political — it was moral.

She says she attended the Utah event where Kirk was shot and vividly remembers the chaos that followed. “I ran toward the stage. I couldn’t live with myself if I didn’t try,” she told The New York Post.

That memory still haunts her. So when Owens turned her conspiracy spotlight on Erika Kirk, Loomer saw red.

“This woman lost her husband. She’s raising kids. And now Candace wants to drag her through hell for views?” Loomer said in a livestream. “No. Enough. This isn’t truth-seeking. This is cruelty.”

Her outrage struck a nerve — and she’s not alone. Dozens of prominent conservative influencers have quietly unfollowed Owens, wary of being associated with what one called “a witch hunt against a widow.”

Inside the Right-Wing Collapse

The feud isn’t just gossip. It exposes a deeper fracture within American conservatism — between the professional political class and the influencer class that thrives on chaos.

Charlie Kirk represented the bridge between those worlds: a polished activist who understood social media but valued message discipline. Owens, by contrast, has become the avatar of online rage — a figure who weaponizes controversy to dominate attention.

Now, with Kirk gone, that balance has vanished.

“Without Charlie, there’s no adult in the room,” one TPUSA veteran admitted. “Candace is unchecked. And the movement is tearing itself apart.”

The Cost of Conspiracy

Experts warn that the spiraling rumor ecosystem surrounding Kirk’s death is emblematic of a new phase in digital politics — where even tragedy becomes content currency.

A media-ethics professor at Columbia University told The Guardian: “We’re watching real-time moral collapse. When influencers monetize grief, the boundaries between truth and fiction dissolve. Every death becomes a narrative — and someone’s next viral episode.”

Indeed, Owens’ podcast has reportedly surged in downloads since she began discussing Kirk’s death. Her videos questioning the FBI, Israel, and TPUSA’s leadership have been viewed millions of times across platforms.

But for those who knew Kirk, that popularity feels like betrayal. “He deserved better,” one longtime friend said. “He gave Candace her platform. And now she’s using it to destroy everything he built.”

Where Does It End?

As of now, TPUSA has not issued any formal statement on Owens’ remarks. Erika Kirk has returned to work quietly, focusing on her late husband’s foundation.

Laura Loomer continues to defend her fiercely, gaining both applause and backlash from Owens’ supporters.

The right-wing internet, meanwhile, remains split — between those who view Owens as a truth-teller and those who see her as a self-serving opportunist.

But one thing is certain: this feud has moved far beyond politics. It’s about loyalty, morality, and the soul of a movement that can’t seem to stop devouring its own.

“In the end,” a TPUSA insider said, “Charlie’s biggest fear wasn’t the left. It was that we’d destroy ourselves from within. And maybe he was right.”

The Final Word

In the glare of social media, truth often dies in the noise. And as Candace Owens continues to fan the flames of suspicion — turning grief into a stage and pain into performance — Laura Loomer’s fury captures something deeper: the human plea to stop.

For Erika Kirk, the widow still learning how to breathe in a world without her husband, the conspiracy circus is salt on an open wound. For the conservative movement, it’s a warning: when tragedy becomes content, empathy dies first.

Charlie Kirk built his empire preaching about courage and unity. Now, his death has become the ultimate test of both.

And as America watches this implosion unfold — in real time, tweet by tweet — the question is no longer what happened to Charlie Kirk, but what’s happening to everyone he left behind.